I shouldn’t start a sentence; whether we like it or not. It’s too easy to say that a state of affairs is unchangeable and give no proof to that effect. C.S. Lewis said: “Whether we like it or not, God intends to give us what we need, not what we now think we want.” I don’t agree with him but there it is again; no evidence needed because God is invoked.
So, I’ll get around this conundrum and offer some reasons why we just must accept we cannot change a situation that is proving to be more than challenging.
It’s a technocratic world. Or you could say; the geeks have it. My reference goes back to the mid-70s. In that time, we lived in an analogue world. Yes, there were exotic computers being used and predictions coming from science fiction about robots and endless leisure time ahead but most day-to-day experiences involved simple stuff like a pen and paper and a telephone.
To an extent, early digital equipment started to bring more structure into work life as kitchen table management gave way of planning tools and schedules. In the 1980s, the widespread take-up of personal computers meant that the creation of elaborate Gantt charts and spreadsheets became every day. A need for structure and systems gradually overtook the “seat of the pants” way of working.
This was not for everyone, as some organisations considered themselves immune or languished in a holding pattern. A danger of decline faced those who resisted adopting the latest technology and ways of working. Generally, the institutes of Government were slow to change. In particular, the long-lived democratic institutions struggled with the wave of systematic ways of working that have become the mode.
What’s my point? It’s evident to me that, this week, the signals coming from negotiations in Brussels are not good. That part of what is going on is a clash between the new and the old. When systematic and methodical people meet casual, make-it-up-as-you-go along people there’s inevitably a clash. Who’s in the right or who’s in the wrong hardly matters at all if two parties can’t see eye-to-eye. Let’s go back to my initial assertion; it’s a technocratic world. Well it is and the laissez-faire people who try to deny that fact aren’t going to be winners.
Given the realisation that Brexit leaves a bad taste in people’s mouth and slowly but surely the public are turning against the politicians who are driving the Country off the cliff, its surprising that those who choose a different course of action are not having more success. When asked: Brexit would you vote the same again? It’s clear many people have changed their minds but why are they not being adequately represented?
Many people are aware of the Richter scale is used to rate the magnitude of earthquakes. As I waked into a supermarket this lunchtime, I happened to glance the front page of the Daily Telegraph. It was plastered with another one of those stories about how much safety and richer we are all going to be because of Brexit. I didn’t have a chair to fall off but if I did I would have fallen off it. I know it’s the silly season but the ludicrous notions that are spread by the right-wing Press, as a monster face saver, are just beyond belief. The detail isn’t worth bothering about but the effect of such plagues of wrongheaded wibble are real. Normality isn’t normal anymore. It’s disturbing.
There’s so much to indicate what’s going wrong that I’m amazed people are not making more noise. Pound down, inflation up, pay going nowhere, companies moving off-shore and a trade secretary eulogising about selling sunglasses to the world. I know it’s the annual silly season but these are real and not imaginary events. If we don’t take heed of such indicators then further troubles will results with certainty.
I don’t believe the story that many of those we voted Remain have come around to the idea of Brexit. What I do think has happened is a lot of people have been turned off the whole debate because of the crude conduct of a great number of Brexit advocates. There’s the unfortunate “it will be all right on the night” thinking too. Somewhat because we haven’t been accustomed to extreme politics in Britain there’s an underlying assumption that however crazy the talking, sound, solid and sober people in the background will work it out. The reality is that assumption no longer stands.
What is needed more than anything else now is a good strategy for backing out of Brexit. It would be ironic if those who criticised the lack of planning for Brexit didn’t have a plan to get out of it. A road map to turn the ship of State around would help to give confidence to the world.
Farce, insanity and slapstick, they have it all. But what they have in spades is confusion. Keir Starmer says one thing then Jeremy Corbyn says something else. The Trade Unions mumble in the background. A chorus of different voices sound off in every different direction. Its near on impossible to figure out exactly what policy the British Labour Party has on Brexit. Just taking one part of the debate around the Single Market and within ten minutes you’ll be totally confused.
One definition of “stupid” is to keep doing the same thing but, at the same time, expect a different outcome
We do seem to be getting a lot of Brexit related announcements. There often of this flavour: “Great victory – things stay the same
There’s some good news. It’s not often that can be said in this rather peculiar time.